Tuesday, 17 October 2017

Pressurized Flight Cabins and the Japan Air Lines....

Why flight cabins pressure has to be maintained when it is at air...?
Wikipedia has a pretty comprehensive article on this subject and with that here I am telling you a disaster happened due to a carelessness.
But the short answer is that even at 8,000 feet (the altitude at which most airliners are pressurized) there is 25% less oxygen in air than at sea level. Most people in good health can cope with that.
However, by the time you get to 35,000 ft - minimum cruising altitude for most commercial flights - the amount of oxygen in the air is around 75% lower than at sea level. With this amount of oxygen in the air most people will be unconscious within seconds and dead not too long after that.
Even at lower altitudes there are effects which is one of the reasons Boeing have made much of the 6000 feet altitude at which the 787 Dreamliner is pressurized. This brings the oxygen content to around 20% lower than it would be at sea level.
You are probably aware that if cabin pressurization fails oxygen masks will come down. These will supply sufficient oxygen to keep everyone safe until the pilots can get the plane below 10,000 feet - which they will do pretty rapidly since there is only enough oxygen in passenger masks to last around 15 minutes. For this reason planes do not fly over terrain that would prevent them dropping to a safe altitude.
One careless mistake by a Boeing engineer which resulted in 520 deaths, resignation of Japan Airlines then President, suicide of one of the guilt-stricken maintenance managers of Japan Airlines and about one-third drop in air travelling in Japan.
The Event?
Crash of japan Airlines Flight 123
What happened?
This is called rear pressure bulkhead which is located between the cabin and the tail of the aircraft. It is a vital part of the plane which seals the rear of the plane and thus maintains cabin pressure.
In 1985, Japan Airlines Flight 12 crashed after the rear pressure bulkhead failed due to a faulty repair after a tail strike seven years earlier, when a single repair patch plate was incorrectly cut in two "to make it fit".
Boeing later calculated that the incorrect installation would be expected to fail after approximately 10,000 pressurizations; the repaired aircraft accomplished 12,318 successful flights before the crash.
Aftermaths?
  • Only 4 survivors, 520 died
  • Delayed rescue operations resulted in more fatalities
  • Domestic flight travel in Japan reduced by 25-30 % after this incident
  • Then President of Japan Airlines resigned
  • One of the maintenance managers of JAL committed suicide
  • Japan Airlines never used flight number 123 again
How the Pilot and the crew tried their best till the end to save the plane is another great story. They managed to keep the plane in air for more than 30 minutes before finally giving up which is a record in itself and National Geography channel made a documentary film on this.

Sunday, 8 October 2017

Mpemba Effect....!

Have you ever heard about this concept...?

Mpemba Effect....




Before telling you the concept, I want to convey you the words of Mpemba after his discovery......because its worth to read it once....so read till the end if you really want to catch up the interesting thing and how a normal kid turned into a researcher.....!!! 

“My name is Erasto B Mpemba, and I am going to tell you about my discovery, which was due to misusing a refrigerator.”

Read it again.....do you notice the words " .....I am going to tell you about my discovery, which was due to misusing a refrigerator" .

Ofcourse, it is an accidental incident which lead for the discovery of a mystery concept.......!!!! 

Okay....what is Mpemba Effect...???

It is the theory that warmer water can freeze faster than colder water under certain circumstances.

The effect has been noted since ancient times but scientists have struggled to explain why it occurs....From here onwards, it is a selected copy paste work from the published article of Mpemba Effect....so forgive it....

 The story of the discovery, and the consequent mystery, is worth a bit of exploration — and the Mpemba effect carries numerous important lessons about the nature and method of scientific discovery.

Mpemba made his accidental discovery in Tanzania in 1963, when he was only 13 years old and in secondary school.  In spite of widespread disdain from his classmates, he surreptitiously continued experiments on the phenomenon until he had the good fortune in high school to interact with Professor Denis Osborne of the University College Dar es Salaam.  Osborne was intrigued, carried out his own experiments, and in 1969 the two published a paper in the journal Physics Education.
This article is, in my opinion, one of the most remarkable in all of the history of physics.  Aside from its title, “Cool?”, it is also unusual in being presented in two parts: Mpemba gives a first person account in his own words of his discovery in the first half, and Osborne picks up the story and describes the follow-up experiments in the second half.  Mpemba’s own account is so charming and fascinating that it is worth quoting from liberally:
My name is Erasto B Mpemba, and I am going to tell you about my discovery, which was due to misusing a refrigerator. All of you know that it is advisable not to put hot things in a refrigerator, for you somehow shock it; and it will not last long.
In 1963, when I was in form 3 in Magamba Secondary School, Tanzania, I used to make ice-cream. The boys at the school do this by boiling milk, mixing it with sugar and putting it into the freezing chamber in the refrigerator, after it has first cooled nearly to room temperature. A lot of boys make it and there is a rush to get space in the refrigerator.
One day after buying milk from the local women, I started boiling it. Another boy, who had bought some milk for making ice-cream, ran to the refrigerator when he saw me boiling up milk and quickly mixed his milk with sugar and poured it into the icetray without boiling it; so that he may not miss his chance. Knowing that if I waited for the boiled milk to cool before placing it in the refrigerator I would lose the last available ice-tray, I decided to risk ruin to the refrigerator on that day by putting hot milk into it. The other boy and I went back an hour and a half later and found that my tray of milk had frozen into ice-cream while his was still only a thick liquid, not yet frozen.
I asked my physics teacher why it happened like that, with the milk that was hot freezing first, and the answer he gave me was that “You were confused, that cannot happen”. Then I believed his answer.
Here we have the beginnings of a classic story of science — an accidental discovery, scoffed at by the “establishment scientists”.
Mpemba might have given up at that point, but he encountered a friend who sold ice cream for a living, and that friend happened to mention that many vendors would use boiling water to make their ice cream!  It was already common knowledge amongst them, apparently, that a boiling mixture could freeze quicker.
After passing my O level examination, I was chosen to go to Mkwawa High School in Iringa. The first topics we dealt with were on heat. One day as our teacher taught us about Newton's Law of Cooling, I asked him the question, “Please, sir, why is it that when you put both hot milk and cold milk into a refrigerator at the same time, the hot milk freezes first?” The teacher replied: “I do not think so, Mpemba.” I continued: “It is true, sir, I have done it myself” and he said: “The answer I can give is that you were confused.” I kept on arguing, and the final answer he gave me was that: “Well, all I can say is that that is Mpemba’s physics and not the universal physics.” From then onwards if I failed in a problem by making a mistake in looking up the logarithms this teacher used to say: “That is Mpemba’s mathematics.”
And the whole class adopted this, and anytime I did something wrong they used to say to me “That is Mpemba’s…”, whatever the thing was.
Here the high school teacher failed miserably — ridiculing a student is pretty much the worst thing one can do in a science classroom!  Fortunately, Mpemba was not deterred:
Then one afternoon found the biology laboratory open, and there was no teacher. I took two 50 cm³ beakers, one I filled with cold water from the tap and the other with hot water from a boiler and quickly put them in the freezing chamber of the laboratory refrigerator. After one hour I came back to look and I found that not all the water had been changed into ice, but that there was more ice in the beaker which had hot water to start with than in the one which had cold water. This was not really conclusive. So, I planned to try it again when I had the chance.
Before he had this chance, however, Professor Osborne came to lecture on physics, giving Mpemba a valuable opportunity:
When Dr Osborne visited our school we were allowed to ask him some questions, mainly in physics. I asked: “If you take two similar containers with equal volumes Of water, one at 35 °C and the other at 100 °C, and put them into a refrigerator, the one that started at 100 °C freezes first. Why?” He first smiled and asked me to repeat the question. After I repeated it he said: “Is it true, have you done it?” I said: “Yes.” Then he said: “I do not know, but I promise to try this experiment when I am back in Dar es Salaam.” Next day my classmates in form six were saying to me that I had shamed them by asking that question and that my aim was to ask a question which Dr Osborne would not be able to answer. Some said to me: “But Mpemba did you understand your chapter on Newton’s law of cooling?” I told them: “Theory differs from practical.” Some said : “We do not wonder, for that was Mpemba’s physics.”
There are many remarkable points in this short passage.  First of all, we see an admirable open-mindedness of Professor Osborne in his dealings with Mpemba, and that open-mindedness would quickly benefit them both.  Conversely, we see a dangerous “groupthink” amongst Mpemba’s classmates regarding science, in which they are genuinely offended by Mpemba questioning the status quo.  Mpemba shows great wisdom in his answer: “Theory differs from practical”.  This is an important point for anyone studying physics: we like to create simplified models to explain nature, but those models often lose real-world aspects in the process of stripping them down.
Mpemba actually continued his experiments in a kitchen refrigerator, with the permission of kitchen staff, and convinced his classmates and the headmaster of his school of the accuracy of his findings.
At Dar es Salaam, Osborne was true to his word and looked into the phenomenon himself.  As he notes in the continuation of the paper,
It seemed an unlikely happening, but the student insisted that he was sure of the facts. I confess that I thought he was mistaken but fortunately remembered the need to encourage students to develop questioning and critical attitudes. No question should be ridiculed. In this case there was an added reason for caution, for everyday events are seldom as simple as they seem and it is dangerous to pass a superficial judgment on what can and cannot be. I said that the facts as they were given surprised me because they appeared to contradict the physics I know. But I added that it was possible that the rate of cooling might be affected by some factor I had not considered.
Osborne sets a great example for all physics educators!  It can be difficult at times, but “No question should be ridiculed” would be a great part of a “Hippocratic oath” for teachers. 
What happened after was the thing which got the place in the history book....!!!!
Some people who argued for the existence of a Mpemba effect in the 13th century, and in the 17th century.  But it was Mpemba and Osborne, however, who brought it to the attention of modern science.


After the deep confusion of 40+ years, a team of scientists in Singapore believe they have finally revealed the mystery of the Mpemba Effect and it lies in the unique properties of the bonds that hold water together....!
If you want to know deeply what is the scientific thing behind the Mpemba Effect means I would suggest you to follow this link http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2483383/Mystery-hot-water-freezes-faster-cold-solved--strange-behaviour-atom-bonds.html
Thank You for reading till the last...take a deep breath, it is over....!!!!

Saturday, 7 October 2017

Oxford Electric Bell....

Good night to all...!

Today we are going to read about the Oxford electric bell...

Okay....what's the different with it..??? it's a bell only, isn't it??

Yes...ofcourse it is just a bell but the thing which made it to stand out is that there is a battery which powers it for 177+ years and still the battery has not drained out….!!!



Can you believe it??

But it’s true…!

Nobody knows what the mystery the battery is made of. So let me call this bell as experiment here…

The experiment is currently kept at the University of Oxford's Clarendon Library.

The experiment consists of two brass bells, each positioned beneath a dry pile (an early form of battery). A metal ball approximately 4 mm in diameter suspended between the piles, which rings the bells alternately due to electrostatic force.

As the ball touches one bell, it is charged by one pile, and then electromagnetically repelled, being attracted to the other bell. On hitting the other bell, the process repeats.

Oops…confusing…it is being hard for us to even understand the concept of it’s working but those people made it to work….

The bell is ringing at 2 Hz; it means you can hear 2 rings each second.

For last 177 years, it's made a whopping 10,911,456,000+ strikes against those bells, and still showing no chances of dying out anytime soon.

It was built by Watkin and Hill in 1825, an instrument-making firm in London, and purchased by Robert Walker, a professor at Oxford.

In 1840, he set it ringing. Today the bell is still ringing…

Hard to believe….isn’t it?

Watkin and Hill left no record of what the piles (battery) were made of. Scientists are eager to find out just how long the mystery battery can go, and then open it up and find out what it's made of, but the whole thing is a bit of a waiting game.

Whatever Watkin and Hill used to make the batteries, the device has extraordinary stamina….!!!!

Guinness Book of World Records called the bell's dry piles the "world's most durable battery"…!!




Friday, 6 October 2017

How important unit conversion is....

Hi all...!

As engineers we all know that, worldwide we are following different unit standards in different countries as per our convenience.....more than the  convenience it is confusing all time.....

Oops.....!!!! here is one of the costliest mistakes in the engineering history caused by this simple unit conversion....!

The simplified statement is that, NASA lost $125 million in 1999 because the engineers failed to convert the units from English to Metric.

The brief outline of the mistake is as follows....


The $125 million satellite was supposed to observe the weather on Mars. But it disappeared before it could reach into a stable orbit...!???

Oh God...! $125 million dollars.....how it could go in vain....???

A NASA review board found that the problem was in the software controlling the thrusters.

The software calculated the force that the thrusters needed to exert in pounds of force (English unit). A separate piece of software took in the data assuming it was in the metric unit: Newtons.

The entire thing was a miscommunication between the propulsion engineers at Lockheed Martin who built the craft and the engineers at NASA.

The propulsion engineers usually express the force in pounds but actually, the force should be converted into Newtons for space missions.

Although the engineers at NASA should ideally have verified that the conversion had been done,but they didn't.

Ultimately, the orbiter came within 37 miles of the surface of Mars when it should ideally have been strictly above 53. So it is something around 16 miles close to the Mars surface..
\
The humongous friction at that altitude was enough to tear the satellite apart....

The only good thing that came off this incident is that the teachers could cite this incident to let their students know of how writing appropriate units is extremely important unless they were willing to lose $125 million....!

Thursday, 5 October 2017

Coriolis Effect...

.Hi all...!!!

I thank you all for being in touch since my first blog...some people are not even cares for my message which carries this link....it's ok.....you are one of the very few who supports me regularly and you being my motivation to write atleast a blog per day.....once again I thank you all...!!!!

Let's get into the todays discussion topic.....an interesting one though.....

In our day today life, we would have been noticed that the water drains in a wash basin or wherever it drains it follows the counter clockwise direction.....


If you haven't noticed it then try it out....it is called Coriolis Effect....

Water goes down the drain counter clockwise in the Northern hemisphere and clockwise in the Southern hemisphere...this is caused by the Earth's rotation....!!!


As I mentioned before you can see the water drains in counter clockwise direction......because as you can see in the above picture we are in Northern hemisphere of Earth....!!!!

Also the earth's rotation is responsible for air being pulled to the right (counter clockwise) in Northern hemisphere and to the left (clockwise) in southern hemisphere....

The above mentioned fact can be better observed from the air flow of hurricane.....!!!


Wednesday, 4 October 2017

Gravity



We all would have been taught that, Newton discovered gravity with the help of an apple......


Isn't it?

And what causes gravity and will gravity exist in vacuum and in space too....?!

We can discuss in detail....read till the end...

For the second part of the question, 

Gravity is a universal force and you can never be isolated from it. It always affects you where 
you are.

You may be thinking that gravity doesn't affect the people in space. But it does affect the people
and the object in the space.

Okay...!

For the first part of the question,

According to Newton's law, gravitation depends upon the distance between the two masses in space.



If the distance increases, force decreases. As the distance between any planet and star is very large in space, we may feel a very small amount of gravitational pull.

So there is no such thing like zero gravity. Because the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the distance between the masses.

As the space is filled with objects (planets, stars, etc.,), the distance between two masses will
never be infinity and the gravity will never be zero....!!!!

You can ask, what about the gravity at the center of earth or center of any mass...?

Yes...there you will feel like you are weightless...it is because all of the forces on you that results from earth's gravity are balanced.

There is the same amount of mass in every direction. So you would be pulled equally in each direction and the net force on your body would be zero. This doesn't mean that there is no gravity at the earth's center, there is a lot of gravity there...!

Clear....??

Okay..! then an additional information, as we know, our earth‘s moon is not having an atmosphere. Because its gravitational field is too weak to have and retain one..

Tuesday, 3 October 2017

History Behind the Traffic Signals....


Hi all !

We all seen that on the road when moving in an automobile, the red color light stops us, yellow gives us a caution and then the green makes us to go....


It is common almost all over the world. Right ???

Okay...from where the traffic light idea came?

The origin of the green, yellow and red color scheme for traffic lights is having a history and which came from rail road signaling system.......!!!!

What...??? from rail road signalling system..???

Yes...ofcourse it is...!

At initial stages, railways used red for stopping as it denoting danger since long time and green for caution, then white for go.

Ohh....it is different from what we use, right.....but they had a justification for the change we have now....!!

After some days, the white color was turned out to cause an accident and got changed into green and for caution, yellow was chosen as it is different from the other two colors.

Then in 1860s, this method was implemented for road transports and ran successfully.

The year is conform but the exact country or city in which the system got implemented for road transports is being controversial as too many cities claiming the same......so let it aside...!

Monday, 2 October 2017

Reason Behind this common thing

Welcome...!

You may seen that most of the water tankers have open roof and keep their rear valve open. Those moving water tankers keep on spilling water on the road....



This is not because of their laziness and it has a definite purpose to reduce the
sloshing effect.

Suppose the water tanker is moving and abruptly comes
to a stop/halt, the water inside will slosh.

This may have undesirable effects including toppling of the tanker.

Oil tankers will handle the slosh by compartmentalization. If the compartment is completely full, the oil inside can‘t move when the tanker stops. These tankers will have many compartments and unload the oil compartment wise. They do not roam around with a half filled compartment.

Water tanker on the other hand have unplanned stops. Taking into account the fact that water is
relatively cheaper than oil.

Truckers adopt the two common ways to control the sloshing effect. One is opening the rear outlet to leak water and another is to open the outlet on the roof. However both lead to waste a certain amount of water.

Unless otherwise an innovative and cheaper way is found to avoid the slosh, the water will spill on the roads forever.
:(

Sunday, 1 October 2017

What will happen if we provide pure oxygen to an IC engine?


Normally we are using the atmospheric air to burn the fuels inside the combustion chamber of our IC engines...

As we know, to any combustion take place, three things are essential. They are heat, fuel and oxygen.



A fire can burn when all these three are present and it will stop when atleast one of them is removed. Every fire-fighting technique you can think of involves removing heat, oxygen, or fuel or else sometimes more than one of those things at the same time.

Okay....come back....as we know, the atmospheric air we use consist of only 21% of oxygen....so, if we use pure oxygen, that is 100% oxygen into the engine cylinders then the output of the engine will be 5 times more than that of current engines.

Due to that, the output power and the engine temperature will be more due to the increased burning efficiency.

But it is difficult to construct an engine which can withstand this much of power at a compact size.  Moreover flywheel and other machine elements should be replaced. Piston and cylinder materials has to be changed as the inside temperature further increased.

Also it is not that easy to get anything 100% pure...!!!!